Tuesday, March 13, 2007

*Special Post: "Slave Owner's Manual"

(The following pamphlet was obtained by my father during his visit to the National Civil Rights Museum. Reprinted here for the Erase Racism Blog Carnival. Emphasis, footnotes, and links added by me.)
The Willie Lynch Address
Gentlemen,

I greet you here on the bank of the James River in the year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred and Twelve. First I shall thank you, the Gentlemen of the Colony of Virgina, for bringing me here. I am here to help you solve some of your problems with slaves. Your invitation reached me on my modest plantation in the West Indies where I have experienced with some of the newest and still the oldest methods for control of slaves. Ancient Rome would envy us is my program is implemented. As our boat sailed south on the James River, named for our illustrious ing, whose version of the Bible we cherish, I saw enough to know that your problem is not unique. While Rome used cords of wood as crosses for standing Human bodies along its old highways in great numbers you are here using the tree and rope on occasion.

I caught the whiff of a dead slave hanging from a tree a couple miles back. You are not only losing valuable stock by hanging, you are having uprisings, slaves are running away, your crops are sometimes left in the fields too long for maximum profit. You suffer occasional fires, your animals are killed. Gentlemen you know what your problems are; I do not need to elaborate. I am not here to enumerate your problems, I am here to introduce you to a method of solving them. In my bag here, I have a fool proof method for controlling your black slaves. I guarantee everyone of you that if installed correctly it will control the slaves for at least 300 years1. My method is simple. Any member of your family can use it.

I have outlined a number of differneces amount the slaves and I take theses differences and make them bigger. I use fear, distrust, and envy for control purposes. These methods have worked on my modest plantation in the West Indies and it will work throughout the South. Take this simple list of differences, and think about them. On top of my list is "Age" but it is there only because it starts with an "A", the second is "color" or shade, there is intelligence, size, sex, size of plantations, status on plantation, attitude of owners, whether the slaves live in the valley, on a hill, east, west, north, south, have fine hair, course hair, or is tall or short. Now that you have a list of differences, I shall give you an outline of action-but before that I shall assure you that distrust is stronger than trust and envy is stronger than adulation, respect, or admiration.

The black slave after receiving this indoctrination shall carry on and will become self-refueling a self generating for hundreds, maybe thousands.

Don't forget you must pitch the old black male vs the young black male2, and the young black male against the old black male. You must use the dark skin slaves vs the light skin slaves and the light skin slaves vs the the dark skin slaves. You must use the female slave vs the male slave, and the male slave vs the female slave. You must also have your white servants and overseers distrust all blacks, but it is necessary that your slaves trust and depend on us but they must love, respect, and trust only us. Gentlemen, these kits are your keys to control, use them. Have your wives and children use thme. Never miss an opportunity. If used correctly for one year, the slaves themselves will remain perpetually distrustful.

Thank you Gentlemen.

Cardinal Principles For Making A Negro
For fear that our future generations may not understand the principles of breaking both horses and men, we lay down the art. For, if we are to sustain our basic economy we must break and tie both of the beasts togher, the nigger and the horse. We understand that short range planning in economics results in preiodic economic choas; so that, to avoid turmoil in the economy, it requires us to have breadth and depth in long rang comprehensive planning, articulating both skill and sharp perception.
We lay down the following principles for long range comprehensive economic planning:
  1. Both the horse and nigger are no good to the economy in the wild or natural state.
  2. Both must be broken and tied together for orderly production.
  3. For orderly futures, special and particular attention must be paid to the female and young offspring.
  4. Both must be crossbred to produce a variety a division of labor.
  5. Both must be taught to respond to peculiar new language.
  6. Psychological and physical institutions of containment must be created for both.
We hold the above six cardinal principles as truths to be self-evident3, based on the following discourses concerning the economics of breaking and tying the horse and nigger together-all inclusive of the six prinicples laid down above.

NOTE: Neither principle alone will suffice for good economics. All principles must be employed for the orderly good of the nation...

...both the horse and the nigger must be broken; that is, break them from one form of mental life to another-keep the body and take the mind. In other words, break the will to resist. Now the breaking process is the same for both the horse and the nigger, only slightly varying in degrees. But as we said before, there is an art in long range economic planning. You must keep your eye and thoughts on the female and the offspring of the horse and the nigger...

Take the meanest and most restless nigger, strip him of his clothes in front of the [other] male nigger, the female, and the nigger infant, tar and feather him, tie each leg to a different horse faced in opposite directions, set him afire and beat both horses to pull him apart in front of the remaining nigger. The next step is to take a bull whip and beat the remaining nigger male to the point of death in front of the female and the infant. Don't kill him, but put the fear of God in him, for he can be useful for future breeding.

The Breaking Process of the African Woman
...In her natural uncivilized state she would have a strong dependency on the uncivilized nigger male, and she would have a limited protective tendency toward her independent male offspring and would raise the female offspring like her...We had reversed nature by burning and pulling one uncivilized nigger apart and bull whipping the other to the point of death-all in her presence. By her being left alone unrpotected, with the male image destroyed, the ordeal caused her to move from her psychological dependency state to a frozen independent state. In this frozenpsychological state of independence, she will raise her male and female offspring in reversed roles. For fear of the young male's life, she will psychologically train him to be mentally weak and dependent but physically strong...You've got the nigger woman out from and the nigger man behind and scared. This is a perfect situation for sound sleep and good economics...

(I've ommited some lines, paragraphs, and pages from the pamphlet, but I think you get the picture. I'd originally planned on typing the whole thing, but I began to get nauseous.)

  1. Guaranteed until 2012. Then what?
  2. "Sins of Omission" by Tim Wise
  3. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalieable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." - The Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776)

10 comments:

Angel H. said...

I've got to be honest with y'all. This wasn't actually the first post.

See, some guy named "mensch" posted this long, drawn-out, rambling, boring, boring diatribe about how the "Slave Owner's Manual" couldn't possibly be real and was most likely published in the 1990s.

First of all, he claims to speak on behalf of a group of people ("We wish to add our $0.02 to the discussion..."). Then he offers some links that, when I try to find them, are broken or just plain nonexistent. By nonexistent, I mean that he (they, whatev) never posts the link in the first place! The only link that actually appears in his comment is "403 Forbidden". But when I backtrack I find that it's the website for a college course on "history and new media". By week 2, they were to have mastered Beginning HTML. Somebody needs a refresher...

Anyway, "mensch" disects the pamphlet pratically word by word, arguing over the usage and history of the words, blah, blah, freakin' blah.

But then he gets to the root of his whole pseudo-intellectual BS when he states "It is sad when people who have been hated on become the next group of haters."

You see, children. it wasn't about historical inaccuracies at all! It was because some white dude was confronted with the raw, painful history of racial discrimination. He was so disturbed by it, that instead of learning from it, he tried to discredit it. Then he puts the blame on the victims.

Dammit! We shoulda known better than to be descended from African people who were forced into chattle slavery, suffered years of government-sanctioned oppression, only to have ourselves face discrimination on a daily basis!

We is so sorry!

internet threepio said...

"Oooh, child, things are gonna" get easier...ooooh child things will be brighter;-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Lynch_Speech

http://www.amazon.com/Willie-Lynch-African-Americans-Issues/dp/0972804307

http://www.takeourword.com/Issue060.html

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-g2NKupQzcqER68wC73_gb9FOeQ--?cq=1

http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/rr/f04/cw/blog/archives/000458.html

what 'color' am I now?

Angel H. said...

And your point is what?

First of all, for historical accuracy the last place I would ever visit is Wikipedia, aka: "Truth by Popular Vote."

Second of all, the Amazon link points to a book that uses the Lynch speech as its platform. Some reviewers like it, others don't. So what?

Then I see a link to webzine that hasn't been updated since 10/2006. Also, the says states nothing about the credentials of the ones making the zine. Sure, they say they're in charge of The Institute for Etymological Research and Education, but anybody can make a claim like that and it means *nothing*. Also, a little satelite imagery showed me that this "institute" is in a residential negihborhood. Hmmm...

And then you gave me a link to some guy's blog. Who is he, and why am I supposed to care?

Also, no matter how many times you post the link, it is still "403 Forbidden"!

Here's what I believe: I believe that you, Internet Threepio, are actually Mensch. You changed your name because you didn't want me to delete you, and you posted this links to try and prove your point.
What's really sad is that you actually cut and paste from the webzine onto the comment you sent me. Which brings me to another question: Are you, in fact, the maker of that zine?

And I suppose that's alos your face in that blog pic, right? I've got one last question for you:

What the hell is your problem?

You go through all of this run-around BS to try and hide your identity and then reveal your identity, and you toss pieces of info here and there that add up to nothing.

All I want for you to do is to stop being such a freakin' punk and tell me what you need to tell me, and let's move on with our lives!

internet pinballer said...

Angel: I like most of your blog. I just find that becoming as racist
( using the tools of racism, lies, deception, falsehood, and eventually, the violence that those things are associated with) is the wrong approach, for me.
So when I see bullshit presented as fact, I respond, to which I am often censored, or accused of being a "troll" or a meanie, rather than the creators of this racist pamphlet,those who push it, or those in history who did such abominable things.
I sent you those links so that you could see the greater diversity of those who know it(pamphlet) to be bullshit.Their are even authorities at Spelman College who have taken that position as well.
I am not any one of those people from the links I sent you, and those people were the same peoole from the initial link, and I choose to remain anonymous.
I just wanted to share that information in my initial post, and you censored it! Then you accused me of several things, sadly.
A far more useful approach would be to publicize forgotten heroes like Robert Williams, and so many more, rather than propagate hate, ala "Protocols of Zion" type material that indicts whole races of people.That act, by definition, is racist, no excuses.
Here is a blog that explores the censorship, the stupidity, the accusational natire of disagree ments, and some other forbidden thoughts, and other forms of malevolent behavior that I have experienced on the web recently. And yes, feel free to flame me. I won't censor you.

Angel H. said...

First of all, I could care less if you choose to remain anonymous by not telling me your name, address, phone number, whatever, but when you don't even stick to the same identity on the same blog, it's fishy to me.

Secondly, in the first comment you posted, not only did you try to represent yourself as a group in order to make your case better, you didn't offer anything to back up your information because your links didn't work or they didn't even exist. And, at the end, you had the nerve to accuse me of having some sort racist agenda (like you're doing now) in sharing this publication without even knowing a thing about me. And THAT'S why you were "censored". And by the way, when someone comes onto my blog saying something that I don't like, it's not called "censorship", it's called "doing whatever the hell I want".

As I've stated before in my post, the reason I posted this pamphlet is because my dad brought it home from the National Civil Rights Museum and I thought it was an interesting read. (If you have any issues with it being distributed, please take it up with them.) I thought it was haunting how it illustrates the petty ways in which people in the Black community put each other down. Honestly, I did not know that the validity of this pamphlet was being questioned. After all, there is some great truth in what is being said: lighter-skinned Blacks are usually valued over darker-skinned Blacks, Black women show great insecurities when it comes to their hair texture, many young Black men are losing esteem within their communities. I was using the pamphlet to illustrate what was wrong, how it got it way, and, hopefully, to begin a discussion on how things can be changed. There was no racist agenda behind it!

If you had concerns about the validity of the pamphlet, I would've been more than willing let you show me whatever information you had. But you misrepresented yourself, you didn't back up your claims, and now you're calling me a racist!

And then there's this little jewel:

And yes, feel free to flame me. I won't censor you.

Thank you ever so much for telling me what I can and cannot do on my own damn blog!

Angel H. said...

Deletion #2:

No free advertising.

The Troll said...

"I thought it was haunting how it illustrates the petty ways in which people in the Black community put each other down. Honestly, I did not know that the validity of this pamphlet was being questioned."
Wow. Great point, wrong pamphlet.

It is the equivalent of using the Protocols of Zion to explain, um, anything at all.....

And, no, I sent you the links, never intended for you to read it as "me and others" and sourced it every time I sent it.

AND "It was because some white dude was confronted with the raw, painful history of racial discrimination. He was so disturbed by it, that instead of learning from it, he tried to discredit it. "

Yikes. White. Dude...You don't know me like that at all, and have even prompted me to reconsider the idea of 'whiteness', in this case, anonymity;-) I never thought I could be white like that;-)

....but that pamphlet is still *debunked racist crapaganda*

And the only thing you are quoting me on that is accurate, is "it IS sad when those who have been hated on become the haters." AND, I changed my name NOT so that you wouldn't delete me, but because I wanted you to FOLLOW the links-- about the racist propagand you are dispensing; and then delete me.

You can flame me at the-troll if you so choose.In that light, there, I have adopted the alias of the "othered' troll at times, and, the identities of the absolute insane double standards, double talkers, the flame retardent and the spoilers. You never ever know anyone, really. But you do know racist cr^p when YOU see it, right? Not that complicated at all--or not.Flame me or don't. That is all I said.

Angel H. said...

Yet another name change. What the hell?

I may have deleted the first comment from this blog, but I e-mailed it to someone. Here it is, in it's entirety:


mensch said…

Yes, this speech sure does get alot of press–in all the wrong places. Whereas it is possible that such a thing existed, and also, yes, these attrocities occured, unfortunately, this ranks right up there with “The International Jew,” or the “Protocols of Zion” as bad racist propaganda.
Here is a link if you are remotely interested. What link? Where?
The provenance of this speech has been the subject of much scholarly (and not-so-scholarly) debate. We wish to add our $0.02 to the discussion, and allow us to say that we believe very strongly that this speech is a ridiculous fake, written in the 1990s (there’s no record of it being circulated before 1993). "We?" "Us?" How many people are writing this thing?

First, the writer of this speech has made hardly any attempt to use the writing/speech style of the early 18th century.

Second, the author was not at all successful at steering clear of very specific anachronisms. We’ll name only the most glaring word-choice errors: fool-proof, used in the speech, actually dates from only 1902. The noun program is not used in the sense found in this speech until the 1830s. Self-refuelling is an utter anachronism, as the term refuelling did not arise until the early 20th century. Use of installed when referring to something other than a person did not first occur until the mid-19th century. Moreover, attitude did not refer to anything other than a physical position until the mid-19th century.

Third, a speaker would hardly need to so carefully identify the date and place of his speech, nor would he be likely to refer to King James as “our illustrious King, whose version of the Bible we cherish”, unless he were a person of the 1990s making a clumsy attempt at writing a fake speech from the early 18th century. We cannot imagine why the writer introduces the theme of “James… our illustrious king” unless it is merely to emphasize that this took place in colonial times. Only someone creating a fake would need to try to establish a date for the speech within the fake itself. And, by the way, James was long-dead by 1712, the monarch of that era being Queen Anne. Finally, there is no evidence that a William Lynch from a “modest plantation” in the West Indies ever existed. There is, however, plenty of evidence for the existence of Captain William Lynch of Pittsylvania, Virginia, whom we have identified as the probable source of the verb lynch, and who was born fifty years after the date given in the speech above.

There are other obvious characteristics of the speech which render it a 20th-century creation. Some of these are discussed at a web site devoted to the subject and created by Anne Taylor, collection development librarian at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. By the way, Ms. Taylor seems to be one of the first to have posted the speech on the internet. She obtained it from the publisher of a free publication in St. Louis, The St. Louis Black Pages, dated 1994 but published in 1993. This is the earliest reference we’ve been able to find to the Willie Lynch speech in print. We think it’s time to send Willie Lynch’s speech to the urban legends department.

And, if the truth arouses your curiosity, here is another>> Another what? and there are many others.It is sad when people who have been hated on become the next group of haters. And that's when I got pissed.

http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/rr/f04/cw/blog/archives/000458.html
Not matter how many times you try to post it, it is still "403 Forbidden"


Like I said, if you wanted to refute this pamphlet/speech, fine, but you offered blank or nonexistent links (how am I supposed to verify your information?), changed your name 4 times (something smells fishy and it's you), and accused me of spreading racist propaganda.

Also, no, I don't want a juvenile flame war because I've better things to do with my life. But if you want to post another comment here and not have it immediately deleted (whichever identity you chose), I suggest you read this first.

A.J. said...

I would like to find the full text of this online for academic purposes. If you found the time to actually type out the whole thing, as well as scan in the pages I think you would be doing a great service to the world. Scanning the pages would be an essential part of documenting it...I would also think about trying to find a host that you know will be around for a while. Like make a PDF file and "give" it to a library with the understanding that it will be made availible. The more of this that is on the net - archived and searchable - the better.

It is one holocaust out of many, and should be documented as such.

Thank you for posting what you did.

A.J. said...

I feel my first post was hasty, and it seems as though the authenticity of this document is in question by a number of scholars. This was the first link I found:

http://msgboard.snopes.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=102;t=000148;p=0

However, I do know other texts regarding the "care" and punishment of slaves exist, and would like to find those that have been researched/authenticated.